Application of nested PCR for malaria parasite detection and classification
Xu Chao, Wei Qingkuan, Li Jin, Xiao Ting, Wang Yongbin, Kong Xiangli, Zhang Benguang, Wei yanbin, Zhao Changlei, Huang Bingcheng
Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences,Shandong Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Shandong Provincial Reference Laboratory for Malaria Diagnosis, Jining, 272033, China
Abstract：Objective To compare the performance of nested PCR assay with traditional microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood films and to discuss the value of nested PCR application for the diagnosis of malaria. Methods Blood samples were collected from affiliated hospital of Shandong Institute of Parasitic Diseases and 17 cities′ CDC reported cases in Shandong province. Finger prick blood samples were taken from each participating individual and used to prepare Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films for traditional microscopy. Anticoagulant or filter paper blood samples were used to extract DNA from malaria parasites.Primers of plasmodium genus-species were designed on the basis of conserved sequence on 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA(SSU rRNA).Nested PCR was applied to the amplification of target gene segments on 4 kinds of plasmodium infected human. The Results of PCR were compared with microscopy and were processed by statistical analysis (chi-square test). The target fragments of PCR amplification were used for species identification and compared with the standard sequence registered in Genbank. Results Among the 259 samples, 249 had been detected positive for malaria parasites by nested PCR. The electrophoresis banding size of 187 samples were 205bp, identified as plasmodium falciparum. The electrophoresis banding size of 45 samples were 120bp,identified as plasmodium vivax.The electrophoresis banding size of 8 samples were 800bp, identified as plasmodium ovale. The electrophoresis banding size of 1 sample was 144bp, identified as plasmodium malariae. No species amplification bands were found in 10 samples, identified as negative. Plasmodium falciparum occupied the highest detection rate of positive samples (75.10%) and plasmodium vivax occupied the second highest detection rate of positive samples (18.07%), in addition, 8 mixed infection were detected (3.21%). PCR products of 5 plasmodium falciparum, 5 plasmodium vivax, 4 plasmodium ovale and 1 plasmodium malariae were sequencing and compared with standard sequence registered in Genbank by blast.The comparison Results showed that fragments size and product sequence was in accordance with the reference. Microscopy Results showed that 171 samples were plasmodium falciparum, 60 samples were plasmodium vivax, 4 samples were plasmodium ovale, 24 samples were negative. Species proportion of microscopy Results were similar to nested PCR,plasmodium falciparum occupied the highest detection rate of positive samples (72.77%),plasmodium vivax occupied the second highest detection rate of positive samples (25.53%).However, there was no plasmodium malariae and mixed infection samples detected by microscopy. Nested PCR were compared with traditional microscopy and the Results showed that consistent rate of detected samples between 2 Methods was 84.56%.But nested PCR positive rate(96.14%) was significantly higher than traditional microscopy(90.73%),the difference between 2 groups had statistical significance (χ2=12.07, P<0.05).Fourteen samples were detected positive by nested PCR but negative by microscopic examination.Ten samples were detected negative by the both Methods .It was worth noting that no samples detected positive by microscopic examination but negative by nested PCR.Furthermore,all 4 kinds of plasmodium species and mixed infection were detected by nested PCR but only 3 kinds of plasmodium species without mixed infection were detected by traditional microscopic examination.The Results showed that nested PCR was more Objective than the traditional microscopy in malaria parasites′ classification. Conclusions The Results indicate that nested PCR used for detection of malaria parasites with high sensitivity and specificity and capable of identifying malaria parasites at the species level when microscopy is equivocal. Nested PCR is also suitable for the mixed infection of malaria parasites and has a broad application prospect in the study of diagnosis and molecular epidemiology of malaria cases.
[1]张本光, 赵长磊, 卜秀芹, 等. 山东省疟疾高发地区发病率与气象因子的多元逐步回归分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报, 2013, 29(3): 257-261. [2]唐克香, 杨恒林. 疟疾病原学检测研究进展[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2011, 6(9): 694-696. [3]Moody A. Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2002, 15(1): 66-78. [4]吴英松, 江晓玲, 李明, 等. 聚合酶链反应检测疟疾的研究[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2001, 1(1): 50-52. [5]钱嘉. 聚合酶链反应技术与镜检法诊断问日疟的对比研究[J]. 中国寄生虫病防治杂志, 2003, 16(2): 93-95. [6]Coleman R E, Sattabongkot J, Promstaporm S, et al. Comparison of PCR and microscopy for the detection of asymptomatic malaria in a Plasmodium falciparum/vivax endemic area in Thailand[J]. Malaria J, 2006, 5(1): 121. [7]Myjak P, Nahorski W, Pieniazek N, et al. Usefulness of PCR for diagnosis of imported malaria in Poland[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2002, 21(3): 215-218. [8]Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu X P, et al. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction[J]. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 1993, 61(2): 315-320. [9]Johnston S P, Pieniazek N J, Xayavong M V, et al. PCR as a confirmatory technique for laboratory diagnosis of malaria[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44(3): 1087-1089. [10]郑灿军, 张倩, 李华忠. 2005-2008年我国疟疾病例诊断和报告情况分析[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2010,14(6):507-509. [11]肖婷, 魏艳彬, 刘凡, 等. 山东省 2 例输入性卵形疟病例报告[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2012, 7(6): 10004-10004. [12]Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Jarra W, et al. Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections[J]. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 1993, 58(2): 283-292. [13]Siripoon N, Snounou G, Yamogkul P, et al. Cryptic Plasmodium falciparum parasites in clinical P. vivax blood samples from Thailand[J]. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 2002, 96(1): 70-71. [14]Scopel K K, Fontes C J, Nunes Á C, et al. Low sensitivity of nested PCR using Plasmodium DNA extracted from stained thick blood smears: an epidemiological retrospective study among subjects with low parasitaemia in an endemic area of the Brazilian Amazon region[J]. Malaria J, 2004, 31(3):8-13. [15]Jelinek T, Proll S, HESS E, et al. Geographic differences in the sensitivity of a polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum infection[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1996, 55(6): 647-651. [16]López C, Saravia C, Gomez A, et al. Mechanisms of genetically-based resistance to malaria[J]. Gene, 2010, 467(1-2):1-12. [17]Ohrt C, Sutamihardja M A, Purno mo,et al. Impact of microscopy error on estimates of protective efficacy in malaria-prevention trials[J]. J Infect Dis, 2002, 186(4): 540-546.
2013, Vol. 1 
